A national scale programme had the mandate, the platforms, and the deadline. What it lacked was a way of working that made its information trustworthy at the gate. This is the shape of how Konstrai closes that gap. The figures and references follow when the programme is released.
The challenge
The programme was already running on capable tools. Information still fragmented across disciplines and contractors, the status of any given document lived in file names and people's memory, and authority submissions were rebuilt by hand each cycle. The mandate required ISO 19650, but compliance is a way of working, not a licence, and no one owned the structure that would make it real.
The approach
Konstrai assessed how the programme actually moved information, then defined the operating model and the information requirements before touching a platform. From there the team stood up the governed environment and operated it day to day, rather than handing a specification to someone else to run.
- A common data environment configured to real states and approvals, not a shared drive with permissions.
- Information requirements, a delivery plan, and a BIM execution plan the supply chain could actually follow.
- Naming, workflows, and approval gates enforced inside the platform, not described in a document and ignored.
- Authority submissions drawn from the same record as the model they came from.
The same partner that designed the structure operated it, so nothing was lost in the handoff between the plan and the work.
The outcome
Information carried its own status. Two teams could no longer act on two versions of the truth, submissions matched the model they came from, and the record was audit ready at each gate rather than reconstructed for it. When a number changed, it changed once, in one place.
Figure on release · gate pass rate, rework avoided, submission turnaround